|
|
Original Message
|
Chris - YOU WERE RIGHT ! |
By Rich Kutzner - 01/14/2002 6:38:07 PM; IP 63.64.219.148 |
I'm sorry for the confusion, it seems my numbers were ones I had written down when the engine was in the car. I decided to jump in the attic (brrr...) to reconfirm and my numbers were exactly as Chris said, couldn't really read the '-94' part of either number on either side from all the corrosion. Of course that still makes you wonder why the difference in the SAAC which reads 31(R) and 32(L) for 68 and 30(R) and 31(L) for 69. Isn't that kind of backwards?
And while I was in the attic, I figured out the stlry behind those 2 holes......I remember hearing that ol' Carroll needed to shed some weight to keep those 'luxury' KRs competitive with the lightweight 68 1/2's.........OK....OK.....it was cold in the attic ! |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|