Original Message
RE: C1AE-B = HP352 rod?
By Travis Miller - 01/31/2002 7:53:09 PM; IP 205.188.199.54
C1AE-B is a confusing number when it comes to connecting rods. So I did some research in my "library". That meant a Ford parts book, a Federal-Mogul Machinist Manual, the Nov. '59 issue of Hot Rod Magazine covering the road test on the 1960 352/360 hipo, and the Dec. '60 issue of Hot Rod with the road test on the 1961 390/375 hipo.

The C1AE-B "forging" number on a rod means that it is a 390 rod first used in 1961 on both the standard 390 and the "special" 390 (375 hipo). According to Hot Rod, the difference was the "special" 390 got a little more clearance when machined.

The confusion lies in the fact that the PART number on a 352 rod is C1AE-6200-B. The forging number is C1AE-A. But that started in 1961. What was the forging number on the 1960 352/360 hipo rod? The only forging number I can find for a pre-1961 352 is EDC which started in 1958. According to Hot Rod magazine, the 352 hipo used a standard 352 rod that was machined for more clearance.

I had better stop now because I am confusing myself.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=11047&Reply=11047><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor11047" onclick="return false;">C1AE-B = HP352 rod?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mike McQuesten, <i>01/31/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=11047',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor11047')
});
</script>
 C1AE-B = HP352 rod? -- Mike McQuesten, 01/31/2002
Collapse <b>RE: C1AE-B = HP352 rod?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Travis Miller, <i>01/31/2002</i></font>RE: C1AE-B = HP352 rod? -- Travis Miller, 01/31/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=11063&Reply=11047><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor11063" onclick="return false;">RE: EDC is correct</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mike McQuesten, <i>01/31/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=11063',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor11063')
});
</script>
 RE: EDC is correct -- Mike McQuesten, 01/31/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=11071&Reply=11047><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor11071" onclick="return false;">61 - 401 Horse 390</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ron Vesterby, <i>02/01/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=11071',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor11071')
});
</script>
 61 - 401 Horse 390 -- Ron Vesterby, 02/01/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=11081&Reply=11047><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor11081" onclick="return false;">Maybe I Dont</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ron Vesterby, <i>02/01/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=11081',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor11081')
});
</script>
 Maybe I Dont -- Ron Vesterby, 02/01/2002
 Yes you could get the 385-401... -- kevin, 02/02/2002
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 202482135 in the box