Original Message
390's for the water
By Royce Peterson - 02/08/2002 3:11:58 PM; IP 216.196.172.252
P,
I think a pair of 390's would work fine in your application if you used good machining and good quality components. For example, a .020" overbored 390 with flat top pistons, Edelbrock Performer RPM heads, cam, intake and carbs. Good quality roller rocker setup from Harland Sharp or Erson. In other words no medium quality parts, only best quality parts. The 390's built like this would be powerful and reliable with power equal to or maybe better than your current engines. The crank and rods in any 1967 - up 390 are identical to your 427's so that would not be an issue. Forged pistons and a good balance job would be recommended. The Edelbrock heads have bronze valve guides and hardened valve seats so longevity would be excellent with unleaded gas. For your RPM levels the Performer cam might be a better choice than the RPM.

That's my take on it.
Royce Peterson
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=11224&Reply=11224><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor11224" onclick="return false;">Dave Shoe, Royce, got some 427 and 390 questions</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>P, <i>02/08/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=11224',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor11224')
});
</script>
 Dave Shoe, Royce, got some 427 and 390 questions -- P, 02/08/2002
Collapse <b>390's for the water</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>02/08/2002</i></font>390's for the water -- Royce Peterson, 02/08/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=11229&Reply=11224><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor11229" onclick="return false;">RE: new article</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mike McQuesten, <i>02/08/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=11229',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor11229')
});
</script>
 RE: new article -- Mike McQuesten, 02/08/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=11309&Reply=11224><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor11309" onclick="return false;">RE: Mustang & Ford</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>James, <i>02/12/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=11309',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor11309')
});
</script>
 RE: Mustang & Ford -- James, 02/12/2002
 RE: Mustang & Ford -- Mike McQuesten, 02/12/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=11339&Reply=11224><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor11339" onclick="return false;">RE: You do get the larger bore with the 427</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>David thayer, <i>02/12/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=11339',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor11339')
});
</script>
 RE: You do get the larger bore with the 427 -- David thayer, 02/12/2002
 RE: You do get the larger bore with the 427 -- P, 02/13/2002
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 202493940 in the box