|
|
Original Message
|
Now I'm beginning to understand! |
By Rich Kutzner - 02/09/2002 6:58:37 AM; IP 63.64.215.61 |
Thanks for taking the time to explain this all to me. Next time you see a KR getting beat at the track, come on up, I'll buy you lunch! So to clarify and put this all to rest, for the 428CJ:
1. The dampner was zero balanced using those 'holes' in the outer ring?
2. If the dampner had been used with the flywheel to balance the engine assembly (SCJ) it would have an externally visible weight on the back of it? i.e they would add weight, not take it out.
3. The damper was part of the rotating assembly during the balancing phase, but not actually used to adjust the balance. That was done at the flywheel.
4. The weight on the flywheel from the manufacturer was probably more than needed so that during the balancing phase weight could be taken out of the flywheel weight (mine has one 'hole') versus adding more?
This has been fun! |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|