Skip Navigation Links Setup New Post Search Forum Home Home Decoder

Original Message

RE: thanks By Mike McQuesten - 03/04/2002 10:24:32 PM; IP 63.50.107.201 Thanks CincyEd. I remember the first time I saw a set. I couldn't believe that "figure 8" style combustion chamber. The guy that owned 'em was thinking about working them for a 428CJ bracket mill. He was guesstimating the C-ratio to be well over 12.5:1. He never did it. But I did talk with a guy on the phone last year from LA who is running a set on a '27 sideoiler in a '69 'stang. He loved 'em. Liked is power proven ETs better than the Edelbrocks he had been running. Not knockin' Edelbrocks, I want to run a set on a engine "in the works". All I did to mine was install 1.66 exhaust valves and do a little bowl work to help take advantage of the larger CJ/LR ex. valve. My head machinist man said there really wasn't enough room to go with a 2.09 intake. I felt badly enough about cutting a set of NOS D-heads up as it was. But then I remembered....will I really give a s%#@ in 30 or 40 years?

This thread, so far...

Skip Navigation Links.  352 HP chamber -- Mike McQuesten, 03/03/2002  RE: 352 HP chamber -- Travis Miller, 03/04/2002  RE: 352 HP chamber -- Mike McQuesten, 03/04/2002  RE: 352 HP chamber -- CincyEd, 03/04/2002 RE: thanks -- Mike McQuesten, 03/04/2002  Great pics...........thanks for posting...... -- P, 03/05/2002

Post A Response

Subcribe

Name: Email Address: Subject: Post: Upload Image: Human Check:   Enter the code 20249636 in the box