|
|
Original Message
|
RE: Derek, what do you think of the Lunati replacement |
By Derek - 03/13/2002 5:52:24 AM; IP 207.102.191.65 |
James, since we're talking about the Lunati version, which is not necessarily 'exactly' the same as the stock Ford C6AZ-B, I'd have to say that your Comp Cams unit definitely gives something up to it.
If you check their listings for other engines (even different brands), you'll find that this same grind appears over and over, with just the lift varying due to rocker arm ratio. These are 'generic' cams, with little real development work for each engine.
Again, although there have been signicant improvements in camshaft design over the last three decades, it can still be said that NOBODY knew more about their motors than the factory.
On the 427, which was designed to run within a (relatively) narrow RPM range, Ford gave it lots of duration and lift (for its day), and a single-pattern design.
However, on the 390GT (which is where the 428CJ cam originates from), which was most often coupled to an automatic transmission and 'street' gears, they went with a dual-pattern design, to acknowledge the limitations of the factory heads and exhaust systems of the day, and make it more tractable on the street.
You don't have all that much duration in your Comp cam, but you do have the single-pattern design. With the Lunati profile at 224°/232° @ .050", and .481"/.490" lift, you're giving up 6°-14° duration, and gaining almost nothing in net lift. |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|