|
|
Original Message
|
Other questions...Other myths. |
By Derek - 03/21/2002 4:27:15 AM; IP 207.102.191.56 |
Thanks to all for the answers here, and good explanations of what was going on at Ford. It's appreciated!
A couple more questions come to mind, one about the CJ vs. MR heads, and another about those early 332/352 motors.
It used to be common practice, when attempting to use any of Ford's 'better' aluminum intakes, like the C6AZ-H or M, Tunnel Wedge, etc., to have to weld-in extra material at the bottom of the runner entry in order to allow proper 'blending' with the larger CJ ports. Does this indicate that the MR head's port floors were actually 'raised' in relation to the ones on the CJ?
And going back to those early '58 332/352 motors, I have been told that (probably) the same ones that were equipped with the machined combustion chambers were also equipped with solid lifters. Further, that the original Ford system used a 'shell' lifter, not much different from what Crane Cams still tries to sell you with an FE mechanical cam.
The lifter in Ford's parts system for the 427 had a C4AZ-B number, indicating it originated in 1964. Yet the pushrod used in the 427's (B8AZ-C) clearly came from much earlier. Since the pushrod seat in a 'shell' lifter is over 1" lower than in the 'dumbell' design, obviously the same pushrod could not have been used, assuming there ever WAS a 'shell' type one used.
Anyone know the real story here? |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|