Original Message
RE: 428 crank difference
By salid - 03/26/2002 8:59:25 PM; IP 208.186.86.6
careful there cougarboy. You are right to be cautious. I believe mustangoldtimer is right, IUA is a SCJ crank. I don't think they were available until 1969. A GT 500KR is 68 model, SCJ cranks were not available. If the seller represented it as the original crank, I suspect he is wrong. To make that crank work with "normal" CJ rods and pistons, the whole rotating assembly will have to be rebalanced, since the SCJ crank used Lemans rods and a different balance scheme.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12240&Reply=12240><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor12240" onclick="return false;">428 crank difference</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>410cougar, <i>03/25/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12240',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12240')
});
</script>
 428 crank difference -- 410cougar, 03/25/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12246&Reply=12240><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor12246" onclick="return false;">RE: 428 crank difference</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>mustangoldtimer, <i>03/25/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12246',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12246')
});
</script>
 RE: 428 crank difference -- mustangoldtimer, 03/25/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12251&Reply=12240><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor12251" onclick="return false;">RE: 428 crank difference</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>410cougar, <i>03/26/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12251',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12251')
});
</script>
 RE: 428 crank difference -- 410cougar, 03/26/2002
Collapse <b>RE: 428 crank difference</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>salid, <i>03/26/2002</i></font>RE: 428 crank difference -- salid, 03/26/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12273&Reply=12240><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor12273" onclick="return false;">A question of balance</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Kevin, <i>03/27/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12273',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12273')
});
</script>
 A question of balance -- Kevin, 03/27/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12274&Reply=12240><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor12274" onclick="return false;">Actually, CJ and SCJ pistons are identical.</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>03/27/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12274',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12274')
});
</script>
 Actually, CJ and SCJ pistons are identical. -- Dave Shoe, 03/27/2002
 RE: Actually, CJ and SCJ pistons are identical. -- Derek, 03/28/2002
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 20248432 in the box