Forum Reply - JCO Consulting Services


Home	Free Stuff	Graphics	Programming Services	Contact Us	Ford Stuff

Original Message

Oops, I looked that up too fast!

By Barry B - 04/13/2002 3:08:10 PM; IP 134.217.237.30

And really goofed things up. Royce is right, only the 220 horse 2V 352 in ’61 and ’62 for US production. Canadian Mercurys could still have the 2V 352 in the Monterey sedans at least in ’63, maybe more years but I can’t find reliable information after that. Data taken from the “1963 Ford Galaxie and Mercury Monterey Shop Manual Supplement, SE-703-63”.

Sorry about the misinformation, It’s been hell week doing taxes.

BTW that C5AE-9425-C 4V intake was used on both the 352 and 390 in ’65 and ‘66.

This thread, so far...

Skip Navigation Links.

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12555&Reply=12555><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor12555" onclick="return false;">352 in Merc.</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Tim C, <i>04/12/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12555',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12555')
});
</script>

352 in Merc. -- Tim C, 04/12/2002

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12556&Reply=12555><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor12556" onclick="return false;">Yes, in '65 only (X Code 352) n/m</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Barry B, <i>04/12/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12556',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12556')
});
</script>

Yes, in '65 only (X Code 352) n/m -- Barry B, 04/12/2002

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12557&Reply=12555><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor12557" onclick="return false;">RE: Yes, in '65 only (X Code 352) n/m</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Tim C, <i>04/12/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12557',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12557')
});
</script>

RE: Yes, in '65 only (X Code 352) n/m -- Tim C, 04/12/2002

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12558&Reply=12555><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor12558" onclick="return false;">RE: Yes, in '65 only (X Code 352) n/m</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Tim C, <i>04/12/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12558',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12558')
});
</script>

RE: Yes, in '65 only (X Code 352) n/m -- Tim C, 04/12/2002

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12559&Reply=12555><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor12559" onclick="return false;">Mercury didn't get 352's after 1962.</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>04/13/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12559',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12559')
});
</script>

Mercury didn't get 352's after 1962. -- Royce Peterson, 04/13/2002

Oops, I looked that up too fast! -- Barry B, 04/13/2002