Original Message
RE: Performer vs. RPM
By Gerry Proctor - 05/03/2002 12:01:27 PM; IP 207.133.188.254
It sound like you need low-end torque, which would make the RPM cam an unsuitable candidate especially with a large-bodied car like a Galaxy, more so with an automatic without a lot of stall and a short rear gear. You need to consider a cam with .050 duration of 210-degrees or less with lobe separation in the 112-114-degree range. Lift is irrelevant to idle quality and street manners.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12820&Reply=12820><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor12820" onclick="return false;">Performer vs. RPM</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Brett, <i>05/02/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12820',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12820')
});
</script>
 Performer vs. RPM -- Brett, 05/02/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12829&Reply=12820><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor12829" onclick="return false;">RE: Performer vs. RPM</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Gerry Proctor, <i>05/03/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12829',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12829')
});
</script>
 RE: Performer vs. RPM -- Gerry Proctor, 05/03/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12831&Reply=12820><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor12831" onclick="return false;">RE: Performer vs. RPM</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Brett, <i>05/03/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12831',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12831')
});
</script>
 RE: Performer vs. RPM -- Brett, 05/03/2002
RE: Performer vs. RPM -- Gerry Proctor, 05/03/2002
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 202473058 in the box