|
|
Original Message
|
RE: Re: p. S. |
By hawkrod - 08/25/2002 8:14:44 PM; IP 198.81.16.52 |
i understand your logic but i don't think it worked that way. inspecting parts to check to see if they could be bored bigger would be more work than casting them to be made bigger. the 428 block was available as a service part as late as 75 for sure. i have a block that was an NOS sevice assy #D0OZ-6009-E and is dated january 23 1973 and the assembly date stamped on the pad is february 3rd. the block has ribs but no casting number and is a 105 block. the box is dated 2/73 also. hawkrod |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|