| 
     
    
        |   
                       
         | 
     
    
        |   
            Original Message        
         | 
     
    
        
            
	
		| RE: cam profile | 
	 
		| By Mike McQuesten - 10/23/2002 2:35:14 PM; IP 206.193.0.120 | 
	 
		That's it Sean.  And Gerry's response about the stock GT/CJ/PI cam being too wimpy is pretty well universally accepted as a common opinion.  The C6OZ-B is a performance compromise cam.  It idles very nicely.  Too nice for some of us.  It has a decent power range from idle to 5,400 or so.   It was a huge improvement over the standard hydraulic FE cam of 1966.   I like them  so much that I run one in a 390 in my '68 F100 pickup.  That's right, a great all around RV cam.  But if I was building a modern FE, I don't think I'd select a C6OZ-B.   
  A suggestion, if you do run one,  consider running adjustable rockers thus providing a little more lift with the 1.76 rocker ratio over the non adjust. 1.73.  And with those adjustables you can run anti pump-up hydraulics which might provide a little more power in the mid 5,000 RPM range.
  I've said it before and I'll say it again right here.....choosing a cam is a very personal process.  You've got to really think out what you want and then coordinate the whole engine package.  | 
	 
 
         |         
     
    
        |   
            This thread, so far...        
         | 
     
    
        | 
            
         | 
     
    
        |   
            Post A Response        
         | 
     
    
        |  
            
         | 
     
    
        | 
            
         | 
     
                                
                                 
                              
                         |