Home
Free Stuff
Graphics
Programming Services
Contact Us
Ford Stuff
Skip Navigation Links
Setup
New Post
Search
Forum Home
Home
Decoder
Original Message
RE: 428CJ vs. 429SCJ
By TOM
- 12/27/2002 3:30:11 AM; IP 68.104.83.152
aww come on the 351 CJ is a Monster in waiting just needs to be tuned in right
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Interesting thread on Cyclone/Torino forum titled
--
2cj's,
12/26/2002
RE: Interesting thread on Cyclone/Torino forum titled
--
Bob Sprowl,
12/26/2002
Url
--
Wayne K.,
12/26/2002
RE: 428CJ vs. 429SCJ
--
McQ,
12/26/2002
RE: 428CJ vs. 429SCJ
--
TOM,
12/27/2002
I think its neither - just a good, low-octane mill. [n/m]
--
Mr F,
12/27/2002
351cj
--
Wayne K.,
12/27/2002
RE: very sorry..
--
McQ,
12/27/2002
It wasn't derogatory, and you were right.
--
Dave Shoe,
12/27/2002
RE; They have potential from 4000 to 8000 to big?
--
Ray,
12/28/2002
I did back to back comparisons at the track.....
--
kevin,
12/28/2002
The advantage of the 302C head is not on the track
--
Styletone58,
12/28/2002
RE: No question about it ! n/m
--
Ray Tirri,
12/28/2002
RE: Are we talking about racing them?
--
Ray Tirri,
12/28/2002
RE: very sorry..
--
rich,
05/30/2004
From the factory, '351 HO' was only offered in Mustangs. [n/m]
--
Mr F,
05/31/2004
recent events suggest the 429 CJ can't beat a 390,
--
blinker,
06/01/2004
can't beat a 390,
--
giacamo,
06/01/2004
Post A Response
Subcribe
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:
Enter the code 202404236 in the box