Original Message
Re: c4ae-g?
By McQ - 04/18/2003 3:06:53 PM; IP 206.193.48.99
You probably have castings C4AE-G which was the common 352/390 head of late '64 through '65. And as Royce has indicated there should be no problem with running these heads. Actually they are an excellent head that provides equal to or better flow than the C8OE-N CJ head if properly worked, i.e., CJ/low riser valves, pocket porting, etc.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=16935&Reply=16935><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor16935" onclick="return false;">390 fe</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Gary Goblirsch, <i>04/17/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=16935',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor16935')
});
</script>
 390 fe -- Gary Goblirsch, 04/17/2003
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=16938&Reply=16935><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor16938" onclick="return false;">Heads</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>04/18/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=16938',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor16938')
});
</script>
 Heads -- Royce Peterson, 04/18/2003
Re: c4ae-g? -- McQ, 04/18/2003
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2024203636 in the box