Forum Reply - JCO Consulting Services


Home	Free Stuff	Graphics	Programming Services	Contact Us	Ford Stuff

Original Message

Thanks for the update.

By Dave Shoe - 05/30/2003 7:03:43 PM; IP 216.243.176.34

It's apparently the same as a "T" intake found in 1966-later marine applications. I suspect it was brought out for hood-clearance issues, possibly for 390 shaker application? (total guess - don't believe it).

It's the same as on most 1966-72 pickup trucks, except that the trucks are all 2-barrel units. The 1973-76 390s inherited a modified version of this intake with an EGR port in the carb flange. You'll note it also looks identical to all 1958-65 iron intakes, except the port face is tapered to port match the 1958-65 head.

It's neat to learn the Mustang (C9ZE says Mustang) got this intake. I was unaware of it's use on cars.

Shoe.

This thread, so far...

Skip Navigation Links.

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17349&Reply=17349><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor17349" onclick="return false;">intake repair-HELP</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Chad, <i>05/29/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=17349',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor17349')
});
</script>

intake repair-HELP -- Chad, 05/29/2003

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17366&Reply=17349><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor17366" onclick="return false;">I don't think it's a 428 intake.</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>05/30/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=17366',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor17366')
});
</script>

I don't think it's a 428 intake. -- Dave Shoe, 05/30/2003

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17370&Reply=17349><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor17370" onclick="return false;">RE: I don't think it's a 428 intake.</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Chad, <i>05/30/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=17370',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor17370')
});
</script>

RE: I don't think it's a 428 intake. -- Chad, 05/30/2003

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17383&Reply=17349><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor17383" onclick="return false;">RE: I don't think it's a 428 intake.</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Barry B, <i>05/30/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=17383',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor17383')
});
</script>

RE: I don't think it's a 428 intake. -- Barry B, 05/30/2003

Collapse <b>Thanks for the update.</b> -- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>05/30/2003</i></font>

Thanks for the update. -- Dave Shoe, 05/30/2003

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17390&Reply=17349><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor17390" onclick="return false;">Sure... more info</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>Barry B, <i>05/30/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=17390',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor17390')
});
</script>

Sure... more info -- Barry B, 05/30/2003

RE: Thank's for the info -- Chad, 05/31/2003