|
|
Original Message
|
RE: I politely disagree with Barry R. |
By Barry_R - 07/09/2003 10:34:28 AM; IP 192.55.140.2 |
1) Disagree with me and you run the risk of forcing me to change my mind - - I am always open to comments (and corrections).
2) I concurr with the benefits of zero deck - - it is a good place to go if you can get there. My preference is to target .005 below the deck. This gives a tight quench area while allowing a little room for variances in rod length, crank stroke and piston compression distance. If the block has been cut, you need a shorter piston to hit zero.
3) You are fortunate to have non-cut FE blocks. Many, many have been rebuilt many times. It can get pretty tough to verify (until you measure deck clearance) whether the block you buy at the wrecking yard or swap meet has been cut once or twice in the past 40 years. Ten thou is a pretty small number...
4) Lower weight pistons have benefits in terms of increased rod and bearing durabilty and thus increased RPM potential. They really don't make the car measurably faster - but the higher RPM will - - if you use it.
5) The lightweight pistons do have a downside - you have to rebalance the crank quite a bit to make up for the weight reduction. Is cutting a good FE crank a "good thing" if cutting the block is not? |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|