Skip Navigation Links
Setup
New Post
Search
Forum Home
Home
Decoder

Original Message
RE:another point of view
By Gerry Proctor - 01/29/2004 7:11:08 AM; IP 207.133.188.254
I've run both at various performance levels. While the RPM will do a good job at the low-rpm levels, the Performer will do it better on a milder engine intended to operate efficiently at lower rpm. It also doesn't do too bad at the top of its rpm range. Yes, the RPM will out-flow the Performer at the upper rpm range. No question about it.

The Performer also has an exhaust heat crossover which, if you drive the car on the street in cold climates, makes a huge difference.

I agree that if you're using a run of the mill iron four barrel intake now, you're not going to see a dramatic difference in going to the Performer other than trimming 70 lbs off the nose of the car.

You'll also find that the Performer is much cheaper than the RPM.

Unless you're looking for more power over 4,000 rpm (and you have the cam and head flow to support that) my opinion is that the Performer is a better choice.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=19910&Reply=19910><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor19910" onclick="return false;">390 Intake</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Kowalski, <i>01/28/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=19910', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor19910') }); </script>  390 Intake -- Kowalski, 01/28/2004
 rpm don't even consider the other run search above -- dennie, 01/28/2004
 Agree. RPM is the only way to go. -- Dave Shoe, 01/28/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=19918&Reply=19910><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor19918" onclick="return false;">RE:another point of view</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>McQ, <i>01/28/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=19918', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor19918') }); </script>  RE:another point of view -- McQ, 01/28/2004
Collapse <b>RE:another point of view</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Gerry Proctor, <i>01/29/2004</i></font>RE:another point of view -- Gerry Proctor, 01/29/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=19922&Reply=19910><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor19922" onclick="return false;">The exhaust crossover can be a pain.</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>01/29/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=19922', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor19922') }); </script>  The exhaust crossover can be a pain. -- Dave Shoe, 01/29/2004
 RE: More of a materials problem. -- Gerry Proctor, 01/29/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=25907&Reply=19910><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor25907" onclick="return false;">RE:another point of view</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>jeff, <i>10/05/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=25907', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor25907') }); </script>  RE:another point of view -- jeff, 10/05/2005
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=25924&Reply=19910><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor25924" onclick="return false;">RE:4100 secondary probs?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>McQ, <i>10/06/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=25924', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor25924') }); </script>  RE:4100 secondary probs? -- McQ, 10/06/2005
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=25941&Reply=19910><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor25941" onclick="return false;">RE:4100 secondary probs?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>walt, <i>10/11/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=25941', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor25941') }); </script>  RE:4100 secondary probs? -- walt, 10/11/2005
 RE:4100 secondary probs? -- GREG F, 11/27/2005
 RE:another point of view -- jeff, 10/07/2005
 RE:another point of view -- walt, 10/11/2005
 RE:another point of view -- walt, 10/11/2005
 RE: 390 Intake -- giacamo, 01/29/2004
 RE: 390 Intake -- Brian, 05/26/2004
 RE: 390 Intake -- gurney, 10/05/2005
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2024135720 in the box