Skip Navigation Links Setup New Post Search Forum Home Home Decoder

Original Message

Comp, not Crane. By Dave Shoe - 01/31/2004 9:06:12 PM; IP 216.243.176.34 Thanks. I had Crane buzzing in my head, but it's the Comp 282S that is being raved about nowadays for applications like this. I'm sure many others are great, but I'm not all that familiar with cam profiles, so I keep my ears open. It'll likely be my next cam. Shoe.

This thread, so far...

Skip Navigation Links.  428 engine -- Don, 01/31/2004  Good mix. -- Dave Shoe, 01/31/2004  RE: 428 engine -- Don, 01/31/2004  Crane 282S. -- Dave Shoe, 01/31/2004  RE: Crane or Comp 282S? -- McQ, 01/31/2004 Comp, not Crane. -- Dave Shoe, 01/31/2004  I used a Comp 282S in my most recent motor. -- Royce, 01/31/2004  RE: I used a Comp 282S in my most recent motor. -- Tim P., 01/31/2004  I think attention to detail is important. -- Royce Peterson, 02/01/2004  RE: I think attention to detail is important. -- Tim P., 02/01/2004  Blueprinting terms -- Royce, 02/01/2004  RE: Blueprinting terms -- Tim P., 02/01/2004  RE: Blueprinting terms -- Tim P., 02/02/2004  Guides -- Royce, 02/02/2004  RE: Guides -- Tim P., 02/03/2004

Post A Response

Subcribe

Name: Email Address: Subject: Post: Upload Image: Human Check:   Enter the code 2024144429 in the box