Skip Navigation Links
Setup
New Post
Search
Forum Home
Home
Decoder

Original Message
RE: Actually in '67 frame mounts were same for both.
By Dano - 02/16/2004 7:04:57 PM; IP 67.50.231.43
Thanks for the info guys, But I allready ordered the total control mounts, they include both the engine and frame parts.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20185&Reply=20185><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor20185" onclick="return false;">Motor mounts</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dano, <i>02/11/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=20185', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor20185') }); </script>  Motor mounts -- Dano, 02/11/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20203&Reply=20185><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor20203" onclick="return false;">Sure, maybe - but I wouldn't. Here's a photo from Shoe...</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mr F, <i>02/12/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=20203', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor20203') }); </script>  Sure, maybe - but I wouldn't. Here's a photo from Shoe... -- Mr F, 02/12/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20211&Reply=20185><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor20211" onclick="return false;">RE: Sure, maybe - but I wouldn't. Here's a photo from Shoe...</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dano, <i>02/13/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=20211', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor20211') }); </script>  RE: Sure, maybe - but I wouldn't. Here's a photo from Shoe... -- Dano, 02/13/2004
 Sorry, but they've been obsolete since @ mid-'70s. [n/m] -- Mr F, 02/13/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20226&Reply=20185><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor20226" onclick="return false;">Actually in '67 frame mounts were same for both.</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce, <i>02/13/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=20226', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor20226') }); </script>  Actually in '67 frame mounts were same for both. -- Royce, 02/13/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=20257&Reply=20185><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor20257" onclick="return false;">RE: Actually in '67 frame mounts were same for both.</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>gilles, <i>02/16/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=20257', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor20257') }); </script>  RE: Actually in '67 frame mounts were same for both. -- gilles, 02/16/2004
RE: Actually in '67 frame mounts were same for both. -- Dano, 02/16/2004
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2025181847 in the box