Original Message
3.91:1 rear and a plain Performer?
By Dave Shoe - 06/20/2004 2:01:45 PM; IP 216.243.176.34
That intake is an oinker. It stinks for performance. If you want to see any benefits with that 750DP, you must upgrade to a Performer RPM.

I assume you've got a 9.5:1 compression car engine, not an 8.5:1 pickup truck 390. The extra compression of the car will be good for the 750, but you really need to add a cam kit (includes cam, lifters, valve springs, and you'll soon learn the valve spring retainers and valves also gotta go if upgraded) if you wish any balance in performance.

Double pumpers have a nice feel, but they also suck a lot of gas. In your present build, you'll se mileage drop, but you will not see performance improve, since you are bottlenecked in other areas.

It seems to me some FPA headers which port-match C8AE-H heads, a cam kit, and an RPM intake would make that Galaxie ready for that 750DP. Mileage would still drop, but performance will climb. 650 would also be a fine carb.

JMO,
Shoe.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21889&Reply=21889><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor21889" onclick="return false;">Is a 750 holley double pumper too big for a 390?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Steve M, <i>06/20/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=21889',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor21889')
});
</script>
 Is a 750 holley double pumper too big for a 390? -- Steve M, 06/20/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21890&Reply=21889><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor21890" onclick="return false;">I have a 650 holley on it now. n/m</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Steve M, <i>06/20/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=21890',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor21890')
});
</script>
 I have a 650 holley on it now. n/m -- Steve M, 06/20/2004
 RE: I have a 650 holley on it now. n/m -- greg, 06/20/2004
Collapse <b>3.91:1 rear and a plain Performer?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>06/20/2004</i></font>3.91:1 rear and a plain Performer? -- Dave Shoe, 06/20/2004
 RE: 3.91:1 rear and a plain Performer? -- Steve M, 06/21/2004
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2025102444 in the box