Forum Reply - JCO Consulting Services


Home	Free Stuff	Graphics	Programming Services	Contact Us	Ford Stuff

Original Message

RE: They are common.

By Gerry Proctor - 08/02/2004 11:13:06 AM; IP 207.133.188.254

The insulators (the rubber mount) themselves are the same for the year groups. The difference is in the adapter that interfaces between the insulator and the the frame mount itself.

There are really only two FE insulators. One for the 64 and earlier block and one for the 65 and later block.

This thread, so far...

Skip Navigation Links.

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=22295&Reply=22295><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor22295" onclick="return false;">428 engine mounts</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>John UK, <i>08/02/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=22295',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor22295')
});
</script>

428 engine mounts -- John UK, 08/02/2004

Collapse <b>RE: They are common.</b> -- <font color=#0000ff>Gerry Proctor, <i>08/02/2004</i></font>

RE: They are common. -- Gerry Proctor, 08/02/2004

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=22297&Reply=22295><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor22297" onclick="return false;">uh, not quite sure I understand that answer....</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>hawkrod, <i>08/02/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=22297',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor22297')
});
</script>

uh, not quite sure I understand that answer.... -- hawkrod, 08/02/2004

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=22333&Reply=22295><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a> <a href="#" id="anchor22333" onclick="return false;">RE: Tight fitting 428</a> -- <font color=#0000ff>John UK, <i>08/05/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=22333',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor22333')
});
</script>

RE: Tight fitting 428 -- John UK, 08/05/2004

RE: Tight fitting 428 -- John, 08/08/2004