|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
| RE: solid vs.hydraulic cam |
| By giacamo - 08/15/2004 5:32:31 PM; IP 63.163.157.45 |
| the comp cams solid cams as any solid cam set up have a more agresive profile to the lift and close of the valve wich makes the engin more responsive, then the hydraulic cams the hydraulic setup is my first choice for the streat i use a 270 solid cam in my cyclone for racing i almost used the 305 hydraulic but my experance felt the 270s to be a better choice for a 390 setup, i,v sean many large cam set ups flop on thear face be couse of thear narow bower band and type of auto weight gears tranesmissions ect, not maching,horse power figurers are great but wen selecting a cam i try to make the engin as responceive and rev quicklie even if the horse power figure is lower.i love comp cams thear fe, cams work as avertized but remember bigger douse not alwayes mean better or more horse power........... |
|
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|
|
|