|
|
Original Message
|
RE: Mostly correct on the TL but not entirely |
By McQ - 10/20/2004 1:04:11 AM; IP 65.176.65.74 |
Gerry, first and foremost know that I fully appreciate your knowledge on the FE. You've been a frequent contributor here with, what I've found, to be excellent advice/recommendations. And your post here regarding the trusty TL is full of good facts/figures. I'm always lookin' to learn more.
Now, after all that, I have to ask, what big block FE powered Fords came from the plant with 2.78 low gear, wide ratio TL's? I keep re-reading your statement, "Most big block Top Loaders were also wide ratio units......". This is what has me confused here. I've always thought, this thinking based on personal experience with a number of big block/FE powered Fairlanes/Torinos/Galaxies, and Ford published shop manuals, that the 2.32 low gear-close ratio TL 4 speed was very commonly used behind the FE and HP 289's.
My first FE/T-loader 4 speed was from a late production '64 Galaxie 500/390-4V. It was a 2.32/C-ratio with the narrow trans. to bell bolt pattern. Other than the narrow tr. to bell bolt pattern, the exact same transmission was in a '65 Galaxie 390-4V car, two '66 Fairlane 390 cars, a '68 Montego 390.
With regard to final drive ratio gearing, the unibody cars were 3.25, the Galaxies were 3.50. A '62 HP390 Galaxie I had for a short while back in '67 was a factory 3.89 geared car but it had a BW T-10 and I don't remember what ratio it was. It was a typical BW T-10, bad 2nd gear synchro. I've never had a good BW T-10.
I just want to know where all the FE top loader 4 speed wide ratio 2.78 gear trannys went? I know a lot of guys have "built their own" 2.78 big block 4 speed. But "Most big block TL's were wide ratio"?
I'm seriously waiting to hear more about this WIDE issue. I'll be checking back tomorrow night after game 7, R-Sox/Yanks. |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|