Skip Navigation Links
Setup
New Post
Search
Forum Home
Home
Decoder

Original Message
Would a 1.75 exhaust valve be needed on a 390?
By Bill Ballinger - 08/19/2000 9:16:09 AM; IP 208.44.154.54
I would think that a 1.65 would be plenty big for a 400 inch range engine, and the smaller 390 bore would actally shroud the 1.75 so bad you would lose flow by the interruption of the flow ring.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2443&Reply=2443><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor2443" onclick="return false;">428 cj valves</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ted Young, <i>08/16/2000</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=2443', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor2443') }); </script>  428 cj valves -- Ted Young, 08/16/2000
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2446&Reply=2443><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor2446" onclick="return false;">Yes....</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>John.J, <i>08/17/2000</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=2446', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor2446') }); </script>  Yes.... -- John.J, 08/17/2000
Collapse <b>Would a 1.75 exhaust valve be needed on a 390?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Bill Ballinger, <i>08/19/2000</i></font>Would a 1.75 exhaust valve be needed on a 390? -- Bill Ballinger, 08/19/2000
 I agree bill -- John.J, 08/19/2000
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 202518656 in the box