|
|
Original Message
|
A difference? Yes, but it depends. |
By Gerry Proctor - 05/25/2006 6:42:45 AM; IP 137.242.1.15 |
You would need adjustable rockers (and companion pushrods) if you were running a solid lifter cam. You might (heavy emphasis on the "might") need them for some hydraulic cams too.
You must use an adjustable setup if you are using anti pump-up lifters. The reason for this is that in order for anti pump-up lifter to function properly, preload is usually limited to .020", which is not achievable with a non-adjustable setup. On a standard lifter, the recommended preload range is .060-.080 which is done with a non-adjustable valvetrain.
It also might be necessary, or at least beneficial, to run an adjustable valvetrain with some high-lift, long-duration hydraulic cams. As you get over .550" lift, some cam grinders recommend an adjustable valvetrain. This isn't a carved in stone rule.
If you run adjustable rockers, you also have to run companion pushrods. Pushrods for adjustable FE rockers use a ball and cup design, while non-adjustable rockers use a ball and ball design. There is also an inconsequential rocker ratio difference between the two (1.73 to 1.76) but that ratio difference is a red herring, should it come up.
Regarding a performance difference...if your cam grinder or lifter manufacturer didn't specificially caution that you need an adjustable valvetrain, then you have nothing to gain by converting.
I am using an adjustable setup on my 390, but that's only because I'm using anti-pump-up lifters.
If someone is telling you that you do need an adjustable setup, ask them for justification and see if it coincides with fact. I have no idea why someone is telling you that you do and don't know what their motivation would be for doing so. The only valid reasons are running a solid cam for lash adjustment, or that you can not achieve proper hydraulic lifter preload. |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|