Original Message
390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's
By Ted - 11/27/2000 8:02:17 PM; IP 152.163.213.196
I recently bought a 69 S code mustang Mach 1. When I bought the car it had a 351w in place of the original 390 s code. After doing some research and obtaining a history report on the car I decided I would like to restore the car, rather than go with my original plan of putting a 460 with CJ heads in the car. The change of plans was brought on due to the rarity of factory S code, shaker hood, 4 speed, posi rear 69 mustangs. I am unfamiliar with FE specifics and hope that I can have my questions answered here. I have an H code 390 2-v shortblock out of a 67 galaxie 500, C8AE-H heads, and a 66 C6AE 390 4v intake. Does the intake I have differ at all from the C9ZE 390 4v intake besides for the casting numbers? What types of cylinder heads (possible versions of 390 GT heads etc.) came originally on a 69 S code mustang. What casting numbers should appear on a correct 390 s code block for a 69 mustang? Are FE blocks coded to the VIN? What are the correct exhaust manifolds for this application? Where can I get a 390 shaker snorkle (believe it is Identical to 390/428 non shaker snorkle-?) and shaker bracket? How sufficinent are the parts I have in terms of originality? The build date of my car is 4/14/69 if that is important. Lastly, why did Ford drasticly de-tune the cam specs and carb size for the 69 390 hi po as compared to its 61-68 predacessors? Thanks for the help.

Ted Young
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <b>390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ted, <i>11/27/2000</i></font>390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's -- Ted, 11/27/2000
 RE: 390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's -- Will, 11/27/2000
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=3405&Reply=3397><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor3405" onclick="return false;">RE: 390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ed Foral, <i>11/28/2000</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=3405',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor3405')
});
</script>
 RE: 390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's -- Ed Foral, 11/28/2000
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=3411&Reply=3397><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor3411" onclick="return false;">so the C6AE is a better intake then the C9ZE?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ted Young, <i>11/28/2000</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=3411',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor3411')
});
</script>
 so the C6AE is a better intake then the C9ZE? -- Ted Young, 11/28/2000
 RE: so the C6AE is a better intake then the C9ZE? -- Ed Foral, 11/28/2000
 1969's 390 is a "390IP" - search the archive for that term [n/m] -- Mr F, 11/28/2000
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2025141739 in the box