Original Message
RE: 390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's
By Will - 11/27/2000 11:13:17 PM; IP 24.26.244.78
I think you're making the right decision by replacing the 390. It is a lot more interesting than a 351W, and they're pretty strong and reliable if done right.

You're asking a lot of questions, so maybe it'd be better if you split them up. You may also try asking some Mustang websites. A lot of your questions gear towards restorations, whereas this forum leans more towards FE engineering.

You will have some problems since the 428 CJ Mach 1 was a lot more popular. There's a lack of information on the 390 Mach 1's.

The only question I can answer for you is a location for the shaker hoods. There are a couple of places that usually have them in stock. The only one to come to mind is Perogie. You can find them at http::/www.perogie.com. I also read somewhere that they reproduced the shaker in Australia. They did it in fiberglass. I haven't seen it, but you may want to consider it, if you can find it.

I've seen a couple 390 Mach 1's. They both had chrome "Powered By Ford" valve covers. That's about all I remember. It was a long time ago.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=3397&Reply=3397><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor3397" onclick="return false;">390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ted, <i>11/27/2000</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=3397',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor3397')
});
</script>
 390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's -- Ted, 11/27/2000
RE: 390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's -- Will, 11/27/2000
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=3405&Reply=3397><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor3405" onclick="return false;">RE: 390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ed Foral, <i>11/28/2000</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=3405',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor3405')
});
</script>
 RE: 390 S code 69 Mach 1 resto, have some FE q's -- Ed Foral, 11/28/2000
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=3411&Reply=3397><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor3411" onclick="return false;">so the C6AE is a better intake then the C9ZE?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ted Young, <i>11/28/2000</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=3411',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor3411')
});
</script>
 so the C6AE is a better intake then the C9ZE? -- Ted Young, 11/28/2000
 RE: so the C6AE is a better intake then the C9ZE? -- Ed Foral, 11/28/2000
 1969's 390 is a "390IP" - search the archive for that term [n/m] -- Mr F, 11/28/2000
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2025142553 in the box