|
|
Original Message
|
Stanley finally admits the truth about the Windsor |
By 'Some clown' - 12/27/2000 6:10:03 PM; IP 208.180.124.53 |
As I am the 'clown' that you are referring to, I will reply to your ramblings. In this post (http://jcoconsulting.com/forumfe/reply.aspx?ID=3792&Reply=3773) you inferred that the Windsor was the 'royalty' of NASCAR. "Ever since NASCAR mandated small blocks for racing,Fords have won more races with small block power than they ever did with FE power,thus making the "royalty" the small block (windsor). "
I replied with this post: (http://jcoconsulting.com/forumfe/reply.aspx?ID=3793&Reply=3773) 'I am curious; with your wealth of 'fact', how many NASCAR titles were with won with a Windsor block (not based on, but a true Windsor block)? Now, write down that number. Next, write down how many NASCAR titles were won with a true FE block. Write down that number. Do you see a bigger number in the FE column? Tried to make it easy for you.'
I am amazed that you finally would admit the the Windsor was/is not capable of the performance/endurance required of NASCAR by the following post: 'My argument was in response to some clown saying "Stanley, you tell me how many stock block Windsors ever won a Nascar race". None is the answer,because they never raced with one.' I am sure that if Ford thought that the Windsor had what it takes to win NASCAR, they would have raced one.
It is good to see your humility come through and your admittance that the Windsor isn't all you make it up to be. It's a good engine; it just isn't NASCAR quality. Mr. F- I do consider being called a 'clown' a personal attack and would like to see you put 'Stanley' in the corner for timeout. Or maybe just not let him have recess. |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|