Skip Navigation Links
Setup
New Post
Search
Forum Home
Home
Decoder

Original Message
RE: torque rating of the 428 CJ
By FE427TP - 10/07/2001 3:07:12 AM; IP 24.4.254.136
I find it kinda curious that the 428 is known for torque, but the 427 had more torque ( I think 475lb/ft) at just 3400 RPM which is barely more than the 428. not that I've drove either
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=8500&Reply=8500><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor8500" onclick="return false;">torque rating of the 428 CJ</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>mikeb, <i>10/06/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=8500', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor8500') }); </script>  torque rating of the 428 CJ -- mikeb, 10/06/2001
Collapse <b>RE: torque rating of the 428 CJ</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>FE427TP, <i>10/07/2001</i></font>RE: torque rating of the 428 CJ -- FE427TP, 10/07/2001
 RE: torque rating of the 428 CJ -- Royce Peterson, 10/07/2001
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 202535130 in the box