Original Message
RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley
By Royce Peterson - 11/24/2001 1:50:52 PM; IP 205.188.200.27
David,
In my reply to you the other day I gave you the Ford part number for the correct Holley which belongs on your 390 GT engine. I recommend you throw the Chilton manual out and get yourself a copy of the Ford shop manual for your car. That is where I got the numbers.

The Holley carbs used on 1967 and 1968 Mustangs, Cougars, Fairlanes, Montegos etc with 390 and 428 CJ engines are all model 4150 carbs. That covers a lot of ground, there are dozens of individual part numbers of carbs on these vehicles in two CFM sizes. The 390 engines got 600 CFM, 428's got 735 CFM. All were Holley model 4150.

The Autolite model 4300 was used on 1967 289 - 4V, 1968 302 - 4V and 1969 390 - 4V (there was no 390 GT engine in '69) engines among others. If your Chilton book says that one of these carbs belongs on a 67 390 GT engine it is wrong.

Royce Peterson
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=9544&Reply=9544><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor9544" onclick="return false;">67 390 Holley or not Holley</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>David Siedschlag, <i>11/24/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=9544',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor9544')
});
</script>
 67 390 Holley or not Holley -- David Siedschlag, 11/24/2001
Collapse <b>RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>11/24/2001</i></font>RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley -- Royce Peterson, 11/24/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=9546&Reply=9544><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor9546" onclick="return false;">RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>David Siedschlag, <i>11/24/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=9546',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor9546')
});
</script>
 RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley -- David Siedschlag, 11/24/2001
 RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley -- Royce Peterson, 11/24/2001
 Fan, Radiator info '67 390GT -- Royce Peterson, 11/29/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=9644&Reply=9544><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor9644" onclick="return false;">RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>11/29/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=9644',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor9644')
});
</script>
 RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley -- Royce Peterson, 11/29/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=9693&Reply=9544><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor9693" onclick="return false;">RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Henry Ford, <i>11/30/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=9693',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor9693')
});
</script>
 RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley -- Henry Ford, 11/30/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=9695&Reply=9544><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor9695" onclick="return false;">RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>11/30/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=9695',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor9695')
});
</script>
 RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley -- Royce Peterson, 11/30/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=9722&Reply=9544><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor9722" onclick="return false;">RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>David Siedschlag, <i>12/01/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=9722',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor9722')
});
</script>
 RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley -- David Siedschlag, 12/01/2001
 RE: 67 390 Holley or not Holley -- Royce Peterson, 12/02/2001
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2024102537 in the box