|
|
Original Message
|
RE: FE vs 385 |
By P - 11/29/2001 10:21:05 AM; IP 66.89.75.42 |
RJP, how do you measure "reliability" of the 385, when it has not shown anyone it can run 500 miles or 24-hours at WOT and win against the likes of the Chrysler hemi, Ferrari, Porsche?
As far as having more power and torque, I'd hope a 385 (514 cube) engine would have a bit more umphh, having a 87 cubic inch advantage. My question is, "how long would it stay together on the NASCAR track, or LeMans, running against a well prepared FE". We know what the FE can do, and did, but as far as I'm concerned, the 385 is "untested" in combat.
The one thing I like about the 427, is the fact that there is NO room for theory or conjecture, the record is there for all to see. What we have with the 427 v 385 is basically "the record" versus "the potential", but the potential has never really earned it's stripes in battle (Boss 429 being the exception). I get enamored with my own opinion, on occasion, so feel free to set me straight if I've managed to get too far out on my leash, okay?
Your comments about boat racing are extremely interesting to me. I'm not familiar with the events you mentioned. I do know about the Miami to NY race in which Holman Moody won with a FE (their web page has a nice raceboat pic too). Do you have any links or tips on where I (we) can find out more about FE boat racing history?
regards, P |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|