Skip Navigation Links
Setup
New Post
Search
Forum Home
Home
Decoder

Original Message
That's nice, but you missed a point!
By Rich Kutzner - 12/23/2001 6:04:34 PM; IP 63.64.215.69
As far as I can tell, that rear gear answered the question. Better stick with a dual plane unless you plan on going to deeper gears. When I had 3.25s in my Shelby, shifting at 6500 (428CJ) I barely shifted into 3rd before crossing the finish line. Have since gone to 3..55s and Detroit Locker. I am putting the Edelbrock RPM on my engine this winter. I've put it on other FEs and they are awesome. As far as the definition of 'high rpm' on the street, that's 5500-6500 in your car with that weight and gears!

No matter what you choose......the weight savings alone over that stock PIG will give you more everything! Good luck and don't hurt your back taking it off!
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=10074&Reply=10074><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor10074" onclick="return false;">Edelbrock RPM intake on 427?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Joshua Carroll, <i>12/16/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=10074', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor10074') }); </script>  Edelbrock RPM intake on 427? -- Joshua Carroll, 12/16/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=10075&Reply=10074><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor10075" onclick="return false;">RE: Edelbrock RPM intake on 427?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Bob, <i>12/16/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=10075', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor10075') }); </script>  RE: Edelbrock RPM intake on 427? -- Bob, 12/16/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=10077&Reply=10074><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor10077" onclick="return false;">Hey Bob, can you explain why...</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Jim, <i>12/17/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=10077', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor10077') }); </script>  Hey Bob, can you explain why... -- Jim, 12/17/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=10079&Reply=10074><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor10079" onclick="return false;">RE: Hey Bob, can you explain why...</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Bob, <i>12/17/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=10079', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor10079') }); </script>  RE: Hey Bob, can you explain why... -- Bob, 12/17/2001
 RE: Hmmm, thanks! n/m -- Jim, 12/17/2001
 Higher air velocity on a dual plane... -- Dan Davis, 12/17/2001
 A dual plane is better at low RPM because... -- Dave Shoe, 12/17/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=10088&Reply=10074><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor10088" onclick="return false;">Another opinion</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ross, <i>12/17/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=10088', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor10088') }); </script>  Another opinion -- Ross, 12/17/2001
 RE:Edelbrock F427? -- Jim, 12/17/2001
That's nice, but you missed a point! -- Rich Kutzner, 12/23/2001
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2024123854 in the box