Skip Navigation Links
Setup
New Post
Search
Forum Home
Home
Decoder

Original Message
RE: 428cj vs 390
By Bob - 12/29/2001 11:44:49 AM; IP 65.80.201.141
I believe you are mistaken about the harmonic balancer. I think they are all interchangeable. I use any of them from '68 up and never have had any problems.

I would think that a 428 short block would (should) come with the harmonic balancer and spacer since you can't assemble the front timing cover properly without installing the crank spacer first.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=10233&Reply=10233><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor10233" onclick="return false;">428cj vs 390</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>John T., <i>12/28/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=10233', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor10233') }); </script>  428cj vs 390 -- John T., 12/28/2001
 RE: 428cj vs 390 -- Mac, 12/28/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=10239&Reply=10233><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor10239" onclick="return false;">RE: 428cj vs 390</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mike McQuesten, <i>12/28/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=10239', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor10239') }); </script>  RE: 428cj vs 390 -- Mike McQuesten, 12/28/2001
Collapse <b>RE: 428cj vs 390</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Bob, <i>12/29/2001</i></font>RE: 428cj vs 390 -- Bob, 12/29/2001
 RE: 428cj vs 390 -- DJ, 12/30/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=10269&Reply=10233><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor10269" onclick="return false;">428 Harmonic Balancer (dampner) - same as 390</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>12/29/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=10269', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor10269') }); </script>  428 Harmonic Balancer (dampner) - same as 390 -- Royce Peterson, 12/29/2001
 RE:but John indicated a '66 390 -- Mike McQuesten, 12/30/2001
 RE: 428cj vs 390 -- blake, 01/02/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=10250&Reply=10233><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor10250" onclick="return false;">RE: Good Means?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>R Dreamer, <i>12/29/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=10250', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor10250') }); </script>  RE: Good Means? -- R Dreamer, 12/29/2001
 RE: Good Means? -- Dennis, 01/03/2002
 RE: 428cj vs 390 -- John T., 12/31/2001
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 20241342 in the box