|
|
Original Message
|
RE: oh yes, cam selection..... |
By Mike McQuesten - 02/21/2002 3:27:56 PM; IP 206.193.0.122 |
Ah, the romantic shaft. So many cams & so little time.
Seriously, I now try to avoid cam choices but Matt did indicate that he wanted to bring his '66 428 up to CJ specs. So, how about a C6OZ-6250B? That's the original cam and was Ford's choice starting with the 390GT in '66. Used it as such through '68. Liked it so much they started using it in '67 for the 428PI over the solid lifter shaft that was used in '66. Again, liked it so much they selected it for the 428 CJ & SCJ. It's no longer available from Ford but is available from Crane & Comp as part of their Muscle Car series. Just a dup of the old smoothy. Personally, I like this cam a lot. I have one in a 390-4V that now powers my '68 F100. Very nice idle and it will pull to 5,500 easily. It has a nice broad torque/power curve. It "feels" good to drive around. But as many have said it's old technology.
How would I build a 428 CJ today? I'd go with a solid lifter cam in a performance application. I might even go with a hydraulic roller cam. I might do a whole bunch of things when it comes to cams. Why? Because I like to...I guess. Especially when I make a choice that slows the engine down. Then I can start the drain down....go buy a timing cover gasket set....read about all the promises cam grinders make....we're talkin' some kind of fun.
So what would you recommend Earl? |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|