| 
     
    
        |   
                       
         | 
     
    
        |   
            Original Message        
         | 
     
    
        
            
	
		| RE: Derek, what do you think of the Lunati replacement | 
	 
		| By Norm F. - 03/13/2002 10:01:42 PM; IP 152.163.194.188 | 
	 
		Eric   The CJ specs out about 224 I , 230 E  @050 114 LSA 46 Deg of overlap , (the Lunati CJ replacment cam is probably right on) . The cam you have might be 10-15 HP better than this , hard to tell , dependent on your combination of parts. Its on a 110 LSA and probably on a 106 deg Intake CL which is 4 degrees advanced . If you have sufficient rear end gear ratio and a free flowing exhaust you might try retarding it 2 degrees (108 deg CL) . I think its not a bad pick and should be as good or a little better than the CJ cam. If you want to tinker with cam selection pick up a copy of Dyno 2000 . Its not too bad a tool to compare various combinations.   About every 10 degrees duration up or down will shift the power range about 500-800 RPM , retarding or advancing the cam will have a similar effect.  | 
	 
 
         |         
     
    
        |   
            This thread, so far...        
         | 
     
    
        | 
            
         | 
     
    
        |   
            Post A Response        
         | 
     
    
        |  
            
         | 
     
    
        | 
            
         | 
     
                                
                                 
                              
                         |