Original Message
does the plain 428 REALLY have more
By mikeb - 03/24/2002 8:09:09 PM; IP 64.12.105.23
torque than the CJ or was there some fudging going on? i've heard the torque is what accelerates a vehicle, and that would appear to be a step backwards. If it is true, why would torque have to be sacrificed to get the CJ's increase in horsepower?
thanks
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <b>does the plain 428 REALLY have more</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>mikeb, <i>03/24/2002</i></font>does the plain 428 REALLY have more -- mikeb, 03/24/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=12215&Reply=12213><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor12215" onclick="return false;">RE: does the plain 428 REALLY have more</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Tim B, <i>03/24/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=12215',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor12215')
});
</script>
 RE: does the plain 428 REALLY have more -- Tim B, 03/24/2002
 RE: does the plain 428 REALLY have more -- Bob, 03/24/2002
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 20249410 in the box