Original Message
The advantage of the 302C head is not on the track
By Styletone58 - 12/28/2002 11:08:31 PM; IP 216.244.14.214
The 302C "Aussie" head is simply a 2V C head with a closed combustion chamber. It's advantage is in allowing a quick and easy boost in compression on US 351Cs with dished pistons. This way, you can get a boost in power without having to resort to high octane gas, if the piston to head clearance is not too large. There is no advantage in port flow when compared to the 4V, anymore than any US 2V. In fact, the way the chamber wall is reduced around the valves as compared with US CC heads can hurt flow if it is not removed. The 302C head is great on mild street engines that need torque, where the extra compression and higher-velocity ports combined with a DP intake and a mild, fast-acting cam will make for a brad powerband. Go spinning around a track at 6100 RPM and naturally the 4Vs will excel. There simply is no question. Since when did the 302C head get this big "HI-PO" rep? It's a great head for a mild streeter, nothing else.

I do believe that the 351CJ, named I believe for the cam profile which is the same as the 428CJ as well as to make a marketable performance connection, should have been built using 2V heads and the Aussie 302C-4V intake. Would have been a snappier street engine, if the same CJ cam and converter been used.

Better opinions than mine can be found at the Cleveland forum:
http://network54.com/Hide/Forum/119419
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=15847&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor15847" onclick="return false;">Interesting thread on Cyclone/Torino forum titled</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>2cj's, <i>12/26/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=15847',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor15847')
});
</script>
 Interesting thread on Cyclone/Torino forum titled -- 2cj's, 12/26/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=15848&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor15848" onclick="return false;">RE: Interesting thread on Cyclone/Torino forum titled</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Bob Sprowl, <i>12/26/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=15848',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor15848')
});
</script>
 RE: Interesting thread on Cyclone/Torino forum titled -- Bob Sprowl, 12/26/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=15849&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor15849" onclick="return false;">Url</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Wayne K., <i>12/26/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=15849',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor15849')
});
</script>
 Url -- Wayne K., 12/26/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=15851&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor15851" onclick="return false;">RE: 428CJ vs. 429SCJ</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>McQ, <i>12/26/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=15851',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor15851')
});
</script>
 RE: 428CJ vs. 429SCJ -- McQ, 12/26/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=15852&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor15852" onclick="return false;">RE: 428CJ vs. 429SCJ</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>TOM, <i>12/27/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=15852',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor15852')
});
</script>
 RE: 428CJ vs. 429SCJ -- TOM, 12/27/2002
 I think its neither - just a good, low-octane mill. [n/m] -- Mr F, 12/27/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=15855&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor15855" onclick="return false;">351cj</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Wayne K., <i>12/27/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=15855',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor15855')
});
</script>
 351cj -- Wayne K., 12/27/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=15857&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor15857" onclick="return false;">RE: very sorry..</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>McQ, <i>12/27/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=15857',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor15857')
});
</script>
 RE: very sorry.. -- McQ, 12/27/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=15861&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor15861" onclick="return false;">It wasn't derogatory, and you were right.</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>12/27/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=15861',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor15861')
});
</script>
 It wasn't derogatory, and you were right. -- Dave Shoe, 12/27/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=15864&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor15864" onclick="return false;">RE; They have potential from 4000 to 8000 to big?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ray, <i>12/28/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=15864',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor15864')
});
</script>
 RE; They have potential from 4000 to 8000 to big? -- Ray, 12/28/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=15871&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor15871" onclick="return false;">I did back to back comparisons at the track.....</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>kevin, <i>12/28/2002</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=15871',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor15871')
});
</script>
 I did back to back comparisons at the track..... -- kevin, 12/28/2002
Collapse <b>The advantage of the 302C head is not on the track</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Styletone58, <i>12/28/2002</i></font>The advantage of the 302C head is not on the track -- Styletone58, 12/28/2002
 RE: No question about it ! n/m -- Ray Tirri, 12/28/2002
 RE: Are we talking about racing them? -- Ray Tirri, 12/28/2002
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21673&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor21673" onclick="return false;">RE: very sorry..</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>rich, <i>05/30/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=21673',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor21673')
});
</script>
 RE: very sorry.. -- rich, 05/30/2004
 From the factory, '351 HO' was only offered in Mustangs. [n/m] -- Mr F, 05/31/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21684&Reply=15847><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor21684" onclick="return false;">recent events suggest the 429 CJ can't beat a 390,</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>blinker, <i>06/01/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=21684',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor21684')
});
</script>
 recent events suggest the 429 CJ can't beat a 390, -- blinker, 06/01/2004
  can't beat a 390, -- giacamo, 06/01/2004
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 20243947 in the box