Original Message
Thanks for the clarification.
By Dave Shoe - 03/09/2003 3:05:50 PM; IP 216.243.176.34
So the 1968 427 was a true sideoiler.

It's been only the past couple months that I've fully understood the unique hydraulic 427 oiling system. Your cam info now makes sense.

One more correction from my previous post is: I mentioned the head castings, block castings, and intake castings were the same, but I failed to mention I was specifically comparing the 390GT and 390 non-GT. While the head castings and intake castings were common to all FE cars during the GT years, whether 352, 390, 410, 428, or 428PI, the block castings did differ between the 352, the 390/410, 428, and 428PI, even though they were all marked pretty much the same on the outside. The C6ME or C6ME-A marking does not indicate the sand cores used to cast the block.

Shoe.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=16473&Reply=16473><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor16473" onclick="return false;">Help needed 66 390</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Bow-Tie Basher, <i>03/08/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=16473',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor16473')
});
</script>
 Help needed 66 390 -- Bow-Tie Basher, 03/08/2003
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=16475&Reply=16473><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor16475" onclick="return false;">The cam is the key difference.</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>03/09/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=16475',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor16475')
});
</script>
 The cam is the key difference. -- Dave Shoe, 03/09/2003
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=16476&Reply=16473><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor16476" onclick="return false;">One small correction Dave......</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>03/09/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=16476',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor16476')
});
</script>
 One small correction Dave...... -- Royce Peterson, 03/09/2003
Thanks for the clarification. -- Dave Shoe, 03/09/2003
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=16493&Reply=16473><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor16493" onclick="return false;">GT 390 in 1969</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>ralf bask, <i>03/11/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=16493',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor16493')
});
</script>
 GT 390 in 1969 -- ralf bask, 03/11/2003
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=16494&Reply=16473><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor16494" onclick="return false;">the 390 in a 69 mustang is an IP not a GT</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>hawkrod, <i>03/11/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=16494',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor16494')
});
</script>
 the 390 in a 69 mustang is an IP not a GT -- hawkrod, 03/11/2003
 GT was a Mustang option in 69, not a motor option. -- Dave Shoe, 03/11/2003
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17358&Reply=16473><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor17358" onclick="return false;">RE: the 390 in a 69 mustang is an IP not a GT</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Warren, <i>05/29/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=17358',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor17358')
});
</script>
 RE: the 390 in a 69 mustang is an IP not a GT -- Warren, 05/29/2003
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17364&Reply=16473><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor17364" onclick="return false;">The heads are great.</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>05/29/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=17364',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor17364')
});
</script>
 The heads are great. -- Dave Shoe, 05/29/2003
 About CJ exhaust manifolds... -- Dave Shoe, 05/29/2003
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=17380&Reply=16473><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor17380" onclick="return false;">RE: The heads are great.</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Warren, <i>05/30/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=17380',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor17380')
});
</script>
 RE: The heads are great. -- Warren, 05/30/2003
 The 'IP' is no dog - just needs some coaxing & TLC. [n/m] -- Mr F, 05/30/2003
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2024235510 in the box