|
|
Original Message
|
Conflicting data on solid lifter valve lash adjust |
By P - 03/13/2003 11:13:32 AM; IP 216.80.152.48 |
Hi guys,
I'm looking at a new acquisition this morning, its a 352, 390 and 427 Interceptor Marine Owners Manual, and it's got some interesting info. Inerceptor was the "Crusader" of the day, offering Ford big block marine engines to anyone who wanted one. You could get many different boats with a power option, and Interceptor was one of those options.
For one, it shows the 352 was used as a marine engine, with 8.7:1 compression and 240 horsepower.
The 390 was offered with 9.6:1 compression and 280 horsepower.
The 427 was offered with 8.9:1 and the "usual" 300 horsepower rating we've seen frequently in marine motors.
All three engines were solid lifter versions, with hot valve lash settings .024" for the 352 and 390, but a surprizing .030 for the 427.
Now I'm looking at my Chris Craft operators manual for the 427 marine engine. It shows the same power rating at 300, the same 8.9:1 compression ratio, but the valve lash on the Chris Craft spec is between .020 and .022.
The Interceptor and Chris Craft motors appear to be the same. It may have been Fords "generic" marine offering.
The Interceptor manual says " Improperly adjusted valves can cause a rough idle or excess lifter noise. Excess lifter noise can usually be traced to loose valve, and rough idle to tight valves".
FINALLY ! My question to you guys is this. "With seemingly identical engines why is the valve tappet setting so different?
regards, P (time to crawl back under my rock, all this exposure is frightening) |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|