Original Message
RE: That's a Low Riser style intake.
By McQ - 03/19/2003 6:34:09 PM; IP 206.193.33.27
Actually I do not believe the C3AE intake, cast on March 1, 1963, was used on 390 PI engines. The 390 Interceptors ran the common cast iron 4V intake. What Mike has there is most likely a '63 427/410 horse intake.

Royce is certainly correct that the C6 or C7 428PI intake(which obviously was cast of aluminum)is superior over the low riser single 4V 427, 406 or 390HP intake. Even the heavy C8 Cobra Jet cast iron intake will out perform the C3AE aluminum intake.

The only advantage the C3AE offers over your -S- code standard 4V cast iron intake is weight reduction. And I think appearance.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=16557&Reply=16557><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor16557" onclick="return false;">FE alum intake</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mike, <i>03/19/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=16557',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor16557')
});
</script>
 FE alum intake -- Mike, 03/19/2003
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=16562&Reply=16557><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor16562" onclick="return false;">That's a Low Riser style intake.</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce Peterson, <i>03/19/2003</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=16562',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor16562')
});
</script>
 That's a Low Riser style intake. -- Royce Peterson, 03/19/2003
 RE: That's a Low Riser style intake. -- Mike, 03/19/2003
Collapse <b>RE: That's a Low Riser style intake.</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff> McQ, <i>03/19/2003</i></font>RE: That's a Low Riser style intake. -- McQ, 03/19/2003
 RE: That's a Low Riser style intake. -- Mike, 03/19/2003
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 202423440 in the box