|
|
Original Message
|
Thanks Ross. |
By Dave Shoe - 05/13/2003 8:55:58 PM; IP 216.243.176.34 |
Though I've never run a plain Performer intake, and I've complained about them in the past, I've more recently started to talk less cynically about them, most notably about a week ago. My initial response to this post was sounding too tolerant of the plain Performer, so I could not press the send button.
I appreciate your first-hand perspective, as it'll put me back on a more sensible course.
I started out on 428PI iron intake engines and was very happy. I've never run less than a CJ intake on an FE. As Ross said, a starting point is the Performer RPM and the iron CJ intake. Where you go from there is up to you, but there is NO good reason to look at the plain Performer or SP2P if performance is a goal.
If you are just looking to gain experience at changing FE intakes, I highly recommend the plain Performer - otherwise, plant your income on another manifold.
Shoe.
Shoe. |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|