|
|
Original Message
|
RE: You are comparing apples and oranges |
By P - 11/04/2003 5:14:00 PM; IP 66.89.75.42 |
> i didn't say it couldn't take it, i said the 409's won more races in the > day. there were a lot more chevy's than fords at the track, some things > never change! LOL. also it was much easier to buy a Z11 chevy than it was > to buy a ford lightweight. the other bit of trivia that many people miss > is that most of the race 409's were actually specially designed and built > 427 CI engines that only shared blocks and cranks with production cars. > kind of like a high riser 427 versus a regular 427 only on a much more > radical scale. "427 = 4.312" x 3.65" (6.135" rod) 1963 "Z11" SHP drag race" > here is a nice page that says very little but is interesting: <a href="http://www.myclassiccar.com/CoolCars/closeups/chevrolet/chevy409/"target=_new>http://www.myclassiccar.com/CoolCars/closeups/chevrolet/chevy409/</a> > > hawkrod
Well I'm going to settle the race count real quick. GM was a NO SHOW on the endurance racing circut. They chose to tip toe into the local scene where they managed to make a lot of noise, but as far as being able to step up to the plate, in front of the world, and take on anyone in high rpm endurance racing, the 409 was, indeed (gentlemen) a boat anchor. They were offered with a lot of power, yes, but they couldn't compete with the 406 or the 427 solid lifter motors.
Racing in a lighter weight car, secretly funded by GM, making noise in the local drag strips is a far cry from doing it "publically" and taking the heat or the defeat in front of the entire world. We can all be proud of what Ford did with the FE against Chrysler, worthy competition, but in the world of big block big bucks balls-to-the-wall endurance racing, GM was a NOooooooooo Showwwwwwww.
Reason, they didn't have a motor, heh heh heh
(they had a quarter mile noise maker)
:-) P
|
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|