Skip Navigation Links
Setup
New Post
Search
Forum Home
Home
Decoder

Original Message
RE: 3.91:1 rear and a plain Performer?
By Steve M - 06/21/2004 3:50:34 AM; IP 209.115.87.2
Thanks for the insight. I thought it may be too big, but had to check with the FE people here...
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21889&Reply=21889><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor21889" onclick="return false;">Is a 750 holley double pumper too big for a 390?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Steve M, <i>06/20/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=21889', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor21889') }); </script>  Is a 750 holley double pumper too big for a 390? -- Steve M, 06/20/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21890&Reply=21889><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor21890" onclick="return false;">I have a 650 holley on it now. n/m</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Steve M, <i>06/20/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=21890', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor21890') }); </script>  I have a 650 holley on it now. n/m -- Steve M, 06/20/2004
 RE: I have a 650 holley on it now. n/m -- greg, 06/20/2004
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=21894&Reply=21889><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor21894" onclick="return false;">3.91:1 rear and a plain Performer?</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave Shoe, <i>06/20/2004</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=21894', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor21894') }); </script>  3.91:1 rear and a plain Performer? -- Dave Shoe, 06/20/2004
RE: 3.91:1 rear and a plain Performer? -- Steve M, 06/21/2004
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 202517058 in the box