Original Message
MMH a bit quiet....
By pop428 - 05/23/2005 7:57:19 AM; IP 203.51.220.210
Ah well I guess I'll asnwer this one! YES they are the same!!
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=24997&Reply=24997><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor24997" onclick="return false;">68 - 390 C6 vs. 428 C6 Trans filler tube</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>richard, <i>05/21/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=24997',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor24997')
});
</script>
 68 - 390 C6 vs. 428 C6 Trans filler tube -- richard, 05/21/2005
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=24999&Reply=24997><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor24999" onclick="return false;">RE: 68 - 390 C6 vs. 428 C6 Trans filler tube</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>pop428, <i>05/21/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=24999',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor24999')
});
</script>
 RE: 68 - 390 C6 vs. 428 C6 Trans filler tube -- pop428, 05/21/2005
MMH a bit quiet.... -- pop428, 05/23/2005
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 202422746 in the box