Original Message
RE: Not really
By McQ - 07/16/2005 2:54:54 PM; IP 4.255.74.200
The 375 horse 390HP of '61/early '62 was a great engine. It's the combination of parts that FoMoCo should have offered as an up-grade over the '66-'68 390GT/335/320 horse engine.

I'm not an expert on the 396/375 engine but I've been told by Chevy fans that the engine was very similar to the first 396 true HP engine offered in mid '65 - the 425 horse rated 396. There's no doubts that the 396 Chevy with 350/360/375 or 425 was also a great engine.

I beleive Ford did not over rate the 390HP @375 horsepower with the single Holley or @ 401 horsepower with the tri power induction. If you look at how the '61 Fords ran with this engine, you'd see they easily ran mid to low 13's with minimal effort.

Whereas I believe the 335 horsepower rating was too high on the 3990GT. An engine that took a lot of work/tweaking to get into the 13's in a Mustang or Fairlane or whatever.

I believe the 375 horse 396 Chevy was underrated. In a Nova/Chevelle/Camaro, a person could hit 12's easily with 7" cheater slicks/headers.

Fun question rtd.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=25324&Reply=25324><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor25324" onclick="return false;">375hp 390 vs 396/375</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>rtd, <i>07/15/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=25324',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor25324')
});
</script>
 375hp 390 vs 396/375 -- rtd, 07/15/2005
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=25325&Reply=25324><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor25325" onclick="return false;">Not really</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce, <i>07/16/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=25325',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor25325')
});
</script>
 Not really -- Royce, 07/16/2005
RE: Not really -- McQ, 07/16/2005
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=25326&Reply=25324><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor25326" onclick="return false;">RE: 375hp 390 vs 396/375</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>giacamo, <i>07/16/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=25326',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor25326')
});
</script>
 RE: 375hp 390 vs 396/375 -- giacamo, 07/16/2005
 RE: the actual weight of a '61 Starliner -- McQ, 07/16/2005
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=25330&Reply=25324><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor25330" onclick="return false;">RE: 375hp 390 vs 396/375</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>rtd, <i>07/16/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=25330',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor25330')
});
</script>
 RE: 375hp 390 vs 396/375 -- rtd, 07/16/2005
 RE: Bonneville/Karol Miller -- McQ, 07/17/2005
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2024223638 in the box