|
|
Original Message
|
Sorry, Phil. |
By Gerry Proctor - 10/13/2005 10:03:21 AM; IP 207.133.188.254 |
I wasn't being critical of you. I thought I made that clear. I was addressing John's criticism. Royce sarcastically gave you some of the best information there is on the subject and that you really do need to do the research on this to discover both how scarce and obscure the information is and how difficult it is to put it all together.
You asked a tough question and the answer(s) could be very involved and lengthy. It's also not an area of focused research so there is no one "Big Book of the 427 Tunnelport" to work from. It would be easier to find the depth of information on the 427 SOHC than the tunnelport.
Part of what I do is research -a lot of it on the Internet. Using search engines, as you know, is a process of finding out how to ask the right question and using those results to ask more of the right type of questions. I might have started my search with David Pearson and gathered the artifacts of those results. I might also have tried to associate the tunnelport to the development and NASCAR ruling on the Boss 429. I might also have tried Holman-Moody, or Woods Brothers. Yeah, you gotta plow through a lot of junk that has nothing to do with what you're looking for, but that's the nature of research...more dead-ends that solid leads.
No, Phil, I don't think you're lazy. That's not what I was getting at. Besides, how would I know that? |
|
This thread, so far...
|
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|