Skip Navigation Links
Setup
New Post
Search
Forum Home
Home
Decoder

Original Message
RE: I agree - have you considered 429/460? They were ...
By Dave72 - 11/15/2005 4:31:55 PM; IP 209.206.145.189
CJ's and SCJ's. I don't know if head casting #s wil tell what it is or not. Even the plain, early 4bbl one had 360 hp and 450+ torque.
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=26140&Reply=26140><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor26140" onclick="return false;">1964 t-bird and 1964 mer. montclair</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>gary, <i>11/15/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=26140', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor26140') }); </script>  1964 t-bird and 1964 mer. montclair -- gary, 11/15/2005
 RE: 1964 t-bird and 1964 mer. montclair -- Dave72, 11/15/2005
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=26145&Reply=26140><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor26145" onclick="return false;"> I agree - have you considered 429/460? They were stock, for '71 [n/m]</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mr F, <i>11/15/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=26145', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor26145') }); </script>   I agree - have you considered 429/460? They were stock, for '71 [n/m] -- Mr F, 11/15/2005
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=26146&Reply=26140><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor26146" onclick="return false;">RE: I agree - have you considered 429/460? They were ...</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>gary, <i>11/15/2005</i></font><script type="text/javascript"> new HelpBalloon({ dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=26146', contentMargin: 60, icon: $('anchor26146') }); </script>  RE: I agree - have you considered 429/460? They were ... -- gary, 11/15/2005
Collapse <b>RE: I agree - have you considered 429/460? They were ...</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Dave72, <i>11/15/2005</i></font>RE: I agree - have you considered 429/460? They were ... -- Dave72, 11/15/2005
 I agree also 429/460 time -- raycfe, 11/15/2005
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2024183949 in the box