Original Message
GT Horsepower figure is wrong too.
By Royce P - 01/19/2006 7:27:56 AM; IP 216.196.166.156
Should be 325 HP I think.

Royce
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=26628&Reply=26628><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor26628" onclick="return false;">1968 Mustang Facts Book</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Fred, <i>01/13/2006</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=26628',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor26628')
});
</script>
 1968 Mustang Facts Book -- Fred, 01/13/2006
 Confusing, 'cuz its an abbreviated/edited version of Ford's info. [n/m] -- Mr F, 01/19/2006
 The 'plain' 390 4v wasn't offered in Mustangs...only the 'GT' 4v. [n/m] -- Mr F, 01/19/2006
Collapse <b>GT Horsepower figure is wrong too.</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Royce P, <i>01/19/2006</i></font>GT Horsepower figure is wrong too. -- Royce P, 01/19/2006
 RE: GT Horsepower figure is wrong too. -- Fred, 01/19/2006
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 202416473 in the box