Skip Navigation Links Setup New Post Search Forum Home Home Decoder

Original Message

RE: I'll tell you By Big Dave - 05/13/2006 12:01:10 PM; IP 209.33.49.0 The LS6 was not in NASCAR because the cubic inch limitation was 427 (the Ford 427 was actually displacing 425ci, but Ford rounded to 427. Do the math.). The LS6 was a 454, too big by 27 cubic inches. Also, the SOHC and the Tunnel Port were not on the original list. If they were, the SOHC would come out on top. But neither engine was offered as a factory option, all of the engines on the list were. Even then, I did say that the 427 would come out on top, didn't I? Most of those motors had about the same horsepower, but the weight of the car varied. Therefore, I stand by my original decision.

This thread, so far...

Skip Navigation Links.  how would these engines rate on the street/track? -- inquisitor, 05/02/2006  The one with more horsepressure and better driver. -- Gerry Proctor, 05/02/2006  How close were they in horsepressure? -- inquisitor, 05/03/2006  Well, for one thing, you can't race 'em without a car. ;-) [n/m] -- Mr F, 05/02/2006  They did call the 426 Hemi "King Kong", -- Lou, 05/03/2006  RE: how would these engines rate on the street/track? -- ak, 05/04/2006  RE: how would these engines rate on the street/track? -- giacamo, 05/04/2006  RE: how would these engines rate on the street/track? -- Cobra 427, 05/06/2006  RE: how would these engines rate on the street/track? -- walt, 05/06/2006  RE: how would these engines rate on the street/track? -- Snake, 05/09/2006  I'll tell you -- Big Dave, 05/10/2006  RE: I'll tell you -- walt, 05/12/2006 RE: I'll tell you -- Big Dave, 05/13/2006  RE: I'll tell you -- walt, 05/13/2006  RE: I'll tell you -- giacamo, 05/14/2006  RE: I'll tell you -- walt, 05/13/2006  Was the 428CJ more of a middleweight -- inquisitor, 05/14/2006  Yes -- Big Dave, 05/14/2006

Post A Response

Subcribe

Name: Email Address: Subject: Post: Upload Image: Human Check:   Enter the code 20249753 in the box