Original Message
428 for 67 GT500
By JT - 05/17/2001 4:17:32 PM; IP 12.78.184.223
I put this on the general forum with no answer so far, so here goes... I'm looking at an early '67 GT500 Shelby, and the motor is a '69 428CJ. If this car is ever to be considered "correct", will any 428 motor from the same month as the car's build date suffice? or did Ford or Shelby stamp vin #'s to match the car to the engine? The 8V setup is intact, just not the long block that came in the car. thanks
This thread, so far...
Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <b>428 for 67 GT500</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>JT, <i>05/17/2001</i></font>428 for 67 GT500 -- JT, 05/17/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=6420&Reply=6418><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor6420" onclick="return false;">RE: 428 for 67 GT500</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Morgan, <i>05/17/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=6420',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor6420')
});
</script>
 RE: 428 for 67 GT500 -- Morgan, 05/17/2001
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=6430&Reply=6418><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<a href="#" id="anchor6430" onclick="return false;">67 GT500 keeper...I think</a>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>JT, <i>05/18/2001</i></font><script type="text/javascript">
new HelpBalloon({
dataURL: 'replyb.aspx?ID=6430',
contentMargin: 60,
icon: $('anchor6430')
});
</script>
 67 GT500 keeper...I think -- JT, 05/18/2001
 For '67, having a CJ may even increase value [n/m] -- Mr F, 05/18/2001
Post A Response
Name:
Email Address:
Subject:
Post:
Upload Image:
Human Check:   Enter the code 2025111137 in the box